Having children is a fairly enormous commitment to make because it seems to be what comes next. Some of us have looked at the job description and decided we’re happy without it. More people are choosing not to have children, although that choice is only part of the wider rise in childlessness. Others postpone parenthood until it no longer happens, struggle to find a suitable partner, or face economic insecurity and the difficulty of combining paid work with care. Worries about climate and the future add another reason to hesitate [1–6]. Across many high-income countries, people are having their first child later, and more people in successive generations remain childless. In some countries, falling birth rates are driven especially by adults without children continuing without them [1,3,5,7–9].
The broadest agreement in the research is that parenthood now feels more costly and less compulsory. Effective contraception has made it more possible to decide whether and when to have children. Women’s education and employment, urbanization, and changing values have also altered the conditions in which that decision gets made. Individual choice carries more weight, and voluntarily remaining childless has become more acceptable [1,6,10–12]. Ask people why they don’t want children and the answers are often perfectly straightforward: they like their freedom, don’t want the work of caregiving, or can’t afford it. Some doubt they would be good parents. Others simply don’t see children fitting into the life they want [13–17]. How much more mysterious does that need to be?
To understand the change, we can look at what prevents people from becoming parents as well as what makes some of us prefer a childfree life. Postponement and practical barriers explain part of it; differences between generations and the motives of deliberately childfree adults explain more [1,3,17]. Uncertainty about the future, climate concerns, and changing ideas about what a good life includes now also shape whether people without children intend to have a first child [5,18,19]. There is quite a lot going on behind a birth rate.
First, can you actually make parenthood work?
For many people, the conditions they would need to become parents feel out of reach. They may want children very much and still be unable to make the decision work. Unstable employment, difficulty finding suitable housing, changes in relationships, and weak support for families all contribute to postponing a first birth [1]. “We’ll do it when things settle down” is an understandable plan. It also depends on things eventually settling down.
Which obstacle matters most varies between countries. In Spain and Italy, partnership instability and postponement are particularly prominent [4,20,21]. In East Asia, the expectations attached to marriage can be a problem in themselves. Young adults may avoid marriage because they see married life as incompatible with work and autonomy, while having children remains closely tied to being married [22,23]. If becoming a parent means signing up for a version of married life you don’t want, that is a considerable extra demand. In Finland, the most commonly reported reasons for not having children concern finances, relationships, and work or studies [24]. In Britain and Sweden, lacking a suitable partner is among the most prominent reasons people remain childless at later ages [7,25].
All in all, people seem to become more responsible about whether they are fit to bring a being into their life. Stable employment increases intentions to have children, and access to housing has a strong influence too [26]. A missing partner remains a leading barrier; wanting a child doesn’t conveniently produce someone you want to raise one with [25,27]. Weak policy support encourages further delay [1,28]. Meanwhile, postponement raises the risk of eventually being unable to have children despite wanting them [29]. Waiting can be a sensible response to your circumstances and still have consequences you never chose.
Some of us like our lives without children
Then there are those of us who prefer being childfree. Studies of different sizes repeatedly identify freedom, autonomy, preserving a desired lifestyle, and reluctance to take on intensive caregiving as central reasons [13,14,30–32]. The word “lifestyle” can make this sound rather frivolous, as though we’re discussing a preference for a particular brand of sneakers. We’re talking about how you spend your days and how much say you have over them. That is your life, and you’re allowed to care about it.
Money is part of the calculation, alongside the time and energy parenting takes, the sacrifices involved, and what becoming a parent would mean for your sense of yourself [15,16,21,32]. You can understand the commitment perfectly well and decide you don’t want it. Must every available responsibility be accepted? Some of us would quite like to finish the ones we already have. Women often describe motherhood as especially draining because childcare remains unequally divided even where people strongly endorse gender equality [26,33,34]. Equality sounds lovely. Who is actually doing the work? That helps explain why access to abortion and childcare, along with men’s participation in domestic work, matters more for women’s intentions to have children than for men’s [26,35]. If you expect to do more of the work, you have good reason to pay attention to the arrangements.
Ideas about obligation are changing too. Postmaterialist values, which give greater weight to self-expression and quality of life, and individualist values are associated with weaker beliefs that people have a duty to reproduce [12,36]. Recent Finnish generations report lower ideal numbers of children, with much of that decline coming from more people who are still childless saying their ideal number is zero [37]. Zero is a perfectly intelligible answer. It doesn’t require a tragic backstory.
And what kind of future are we offering?
Economic insecurity now comes with broader doubts about where things are heading. People who expect the next generation to have a worse future than the present one are less likely to become parents [18]. In Sweden, declining intentions to have children since 2012 have coincided with rising uncertainty and a shift from “definitely yes” toward “probably not,” especially among younger adults and people without children [5]. When the decision concerns another person’s entire life, wondering what awaits them seems fairly reasonable.
Climate concerns contribute to that hesitation, although they are not the main reason for most people. Some cite overpopulation and ecological strain, or worry about the quality of life a future child would have, when explaining why they want fewer children or none [38–40]. Representative research from Finland, Estonia, and Sweden finds that highly climate-concerned adults without children are less likely to intend to have them. The difference comes more from choosing no children than from wanting a smaller family [19].
The influence of climate concerns remains moderate compared with the familiar practical obstacles. In Poland, employment and housing matter more overall, although climate prospects and abortion rights influence women’s intentions in particular groups [26]. You can be worried about the planet and unable to afford a suitable home at the same time. The concerns don’t have to take turns..
“Choice” can be a messy word
Historical and cross-national research consistently finds rising childlessness across recent generations [3,8,41–43]. There is strong support for several explanations operating together. In a number of countries, most adults still see parenthood as ideal, and a substantial share of childlessness follows postponement, missed timing, insecure partnerships, or other constraints [2,21,27,44]. We can welcome greater freedom to remain childfree while recognizing that some people never got the parenthood they wanted. Treating every childless person as though they made the same decision would erase quite a lot of their lives.
Economic and partnership barriers have stronger evidence behind them than any single cultural explanation. Large reviews, national surveys, and studies following generations repeatedly identify employment, housing, partner availability, and conflict between work and family life as robust factors associated with becoming a parent [1,20,24,26,43]. Evidence for climate concerns is growing and credible, especially among people without children, but it is newer and more mixed than the evidence concerning costs, gender inequality, and postponement [19,26,45,46].
Even the categories get awkward. Research cannot always neatly separate people who have chosen a childfree life from those who are undecided, delaying parenthood, or prevented by their circumstances from having children [10,15,47,48]. The boundary between choice and constraint can be unclear, and it can move over a lifetime [15,41,49]. “I don’t want children under these conditions” leaves room for both. It is still an answer worth taking seriously.
The findings also differ in how firmly they are established. The rise in childlessness across generations is well supported [2,3,42,43]. There is strong evidence that economic and partnership barriers reduce entry into parenthood, and that protecting autonomy and a preferred way of life are common motives among childfree adults [13,14,16,32]. Evidence that unequal parenting burdens discourage parenthood, especially for women, is moderate [26,28,33,34]. Evidence for climate concern as a growing reason to remain childfree is somewhat weaker [19,26,38,39]. Those differences matter if we want to explain what is happening rather than pick whichever explanation makes the liveliest headline.
Across these findings, parenthood is becoming something people assess more closely and take for granted less. Whether it happens depends increasingly on a secure relationship and financial stability, as well as whether it fits the life someone actually wants. More people are choosing against it as the costs of parenting rise and opting out becomes more legitimate. Uncertainty about the future further widens the distance between wanting children, putting them off, and deciding not to have them [5,6,41]. Having children deserves that level of consideration. So does choosing a life without them.
And whatever your reasons for not having children, you have zero obligation to explain them to your shrink. You don’t owe us a discussion of why you didn’t get a cat, a dog, a hamster, a snake, a bird, or a giraffe either. I do hope you didn’t get all of those. If you did, please schedule a session.
References
[1] Mills, M., Rindfuss, R. R., McDonald, P., te Velde, E., & ESHRE Reproduction and Society Task Force. (2011). Why do people postpone parenthood? Reasons and social policy incentives. Human Reproduction Update, 17(6), 848–860. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmr026
[2] Beaujouan, E., & Berghammer, C. (2019). The gap between lifetime fertility intentions and completed fertility in Europe and the United States: A cohort approach. Population Research and Policy Review, 38(4), 507–535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-019-09516-3
[3] Rowland, D. T. (2007). Historical trends in childlessness. Journal of Family Issues, 28(10), 1311–1337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X07303823
[4] Fiori, F., Rinesi, F., & Graham, E. (2017). Choosing to remain childless? A comparative study of fertility intentions among women and men in Italy and Britain. European Journal of Population, 33(3), 319–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-016-9404-2
[5] Lai, W., Neyer, G., & Andersson, G. (2026). Not only births, but also intentions: The decline of fertility intentions and increasing uncertainties in Sweden, 2012–2021. Comparative Population Studies, 51, 73–90. https://doi.org/10.12765/CPoS-2026-04
[6] Aitken, R. J. (2024). Population decline: Where demography, social science, and biology intersect. Reproduction, 168(1), Article e240070. https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-24-0070
[7] Berrington, A. (2017). Childlessness in the UK. In M. Kreyenfeld & D. Konietzka (Eds.), Childlessness in Europe: Contexts, causes, and consequences (pp. 57–76). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44667-7_3
[8] Wang, Y., Teerawichitchainan, B., & Ho, C. (2024). Diverse pathways to permanent childlessness in Singapore: A latent class analysis. Advances in Life Course Research, 61, Article 100628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2024.100628
[9] Rybińska, A. (2021). Trends in intentions to remain childless in the United States. Population Research and Policy Review, 40(4), 661–672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-020-09604-9
[10] Kelly, M. (2010). Women’s voluntary childlessness: A radical rejection of motherhood? Women’s Studies Quarterly, 37(3/4), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1353/wsq.0.0164
[11] Gillespie, R. (2003). Childfree and feminine: Understanding the gender identity of voluntarily childless women. Gender & Society, 17(1), 122–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243202238982
[12] Anisin, A. (2025). Postmaterialism and voluntary childlessness. Journal of Family Studies, 31(3), 464–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2025.2450030
[13] Glass, S., & Fraley, R. C. (2026). Attachment orientations predict the likelihood of choosing to be childfree and the reasons for not wanting children. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 52(7), 1766–1780. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672251322842
[14] Miettinen, A. (2010). Voluntary or involuntary childlessness? Socio-demographic factors and childlessness intentions among childless Finnish men and women aged 25–44. Finnish Yearbook of Population Research, 45, 5–24. https://doi.org/10.23979/fypr.45051
[15] Mynarska, M., & Rytel, J. (2020). Fertility desires of childless Poles: Which childbearing motives matter for men and women? Journal of Family Issues, 41(1), 7–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X19868257
[16] Parlak, S., & Tekin, I. (2020). A phenomenological study on voluntarily childless women. Psikoloji Çalışmaları / Studies in Psychology, 40(1), 161–186. https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2019-0034
[17] Park, K. (2005). Choosing childlessness: Weber’s typology of action and motives of the voluntarily childless. Sociological Inquiry, 75(3), 372–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.2005.00127.x
[18] Ivanova, K., & Balbo, N. (2024). Societal pessimism and the transition to parenthood: A future too bleak to have children? Population and Development Review, 50(2), 323–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12620
[19] Bastianelli, E. (2025). Climate change worries and fertility intentions: Insights from three EU countries. Journal of Marriage and Family, 87(2), 659–675. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.13048
[20] Lozano, M., Vidal, S., & Adserà, A. (2026). Pathways to childlessness in Spain: Exploring the intersection of partnership and employment trajectories. Population Studies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2026.2682465
[21] Tanturri, M. L., & Mencarini, L. (2008). Childless or childfree? Paths to voluntary childlessness in Italy. Population and Development Review, 34(1), 51–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2008.00205.x
[22] Bumpass, L. L., Rindfuss, R. R., Choe, M. K., & Tsuya, N. O. (2009). The institutional context of low fertility: The case of Japan. Asian Population Studies, 5(3), 215–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441730903351479
[23] Choi, K. H., & Qian, Y. (2023). The rise of the childless single in South Korea. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 15(3), 526–541. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12507
[24] Lehtoranta, L., Klemetti, R., Majlander, S., Heino, A., Gissler, M., & Lundqvist, A. (2023). Wishes and obstacles to having children – Results from the nationwide Healthy Finland survey [Conference abstract]. European Journal of Public Health, 33(Suppl. 2), Article ckad160.1538. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.1538
[25] Schytt, E., Nilsen, A. B. V., & Bernhardt, E. (2014). Still childless at the age of 28 to 40 years: A cross-sectional study of Swedish women’s and men’s reproductive intentions. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare, 5(1), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2013.11.001
[26] Kurowska, A., Matysiak, A., & Grabowska, M. (2026). Beyond usual suspects: Revisiting barriers to childbearing decisions in a low fertility setting. Population and Development Review, 52(1), 94–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.70046
[27] Rotkirch, A., & Miettinen, A. (2017). Childlessness in Finland. In M. Kreyenfeld & D. Konietzka (Eds.), Childlessness in Europe: Contexts, causes, and consequences (pp. 139–158). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44667-7_7
[28] Minello, A., & Russo, C. (2025). The good parent: Emerging themes and gender convergence in narrating fertility choices. Family Relations, 74(4), 1747–1766. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.13185
[29] Schmidt, L., Sobotka, T., Bentzen, J. G., Nyboe Andersen, A., & ESHRE Reproduction and Society Task Force. (2012). Demographic and medical consequences of the postponement of parenthood. Human Reproduction Update, 18(1), 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmr040
[30] Carmichael, G. A., & Whittaker, A. (2007). Choice and circumstance: Qualitative insights into contemporary childlessness in Australia. European Journal of Population, 23(2), 111–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-006-9112-4
[31] Smith, I., Knight, T., Fletcher, R., & Macdonald, J. A. (2020). When men choose to be childless: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 37(1), 325–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407519864444
[32] Ciesielski, P., & Bakiera, L. (2024). Childfreeness in Poland – group description and reasons behind not wanting to have children. Current Psychology, 43(39), 30644–30654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06461-z
[33] Símonardóttir, S. (2024). “Unless I could be like the typical dad”: Exploring parenthood through the perspective of the voluntarily childfree. Acta Sociologica, 67(4), 463–477. https://doi.org/10.1177/00016993241260608
[34] Erkaya, M., & Ustunel, A. O. (2024). A qualitative study on the marital experiences of childfree couples in Turkey. International Journal of Systemic Therapy, 35(1), 80–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/2692398X.2023.2240680
[35] Rezaei, Z., Sharif-Nia, H., Gholamnia-Shirvani, Z., Behmanesh, F., & Ahmadzadeh Tori, N. (2026). Personal, social, and economic determinants of voluntary single-childedness and childlessness among urban couples in Babol, Iran: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine, 24(2), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v24i2.21054
[36] Erfani, A., Jahanbakhsh, R., & Kalantari, A. (2020). Fardgerāyi va niyāt-e bārvari [Individualism and fertility intentions]. Journal of Population Association of Iran, 15(29), 239–264. https://doi.org/10.22034/jpai.2020.243925
[37] Savelieva, K., Nitsche, N., Berg, V., Miettinen, A., Rotkirch, A., & Jokela, M. (2021). Birth cohort changes in fertility ideals: Evidence from repeated cross-sectional surveys in Finland (MPIDR Working Paper No. WP 2021-010). Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research. https://doi.org/10.4054/MPIDR-WP-2021-010
[38] Helm, S., Kemper, J. A., & White, S. K. (2021). No future, no kids–no kids, no future? An exploration of motivations to remain childfree in times of climate change. Population and Environment, 43(1), 108–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-021-00379-5
[39] Blanton, N. (2025). “It’s all up in the air”: Reproductive decision-making in a changing climate. Sociological Spectrum, 45(5), 274–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/02732173.2025.2507363
[40] Miller, A., Ernst, E., Curry, M., & Valdez, A. (2025). In-conceivable futures: Climate change and reproductive decision making among childfree North Americans. Social Currents, 12(3), 231–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294965241300718
[41] Albertini, M., & Brini, E. (2021). I’ve changed my mind. The intentions to be childless, their stability and realisation. European Societies, 23(1), 119–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2020.1764997
[42] Leocádio, V. A., Verona, A. P., & de Miranda-Ribeiro, A. (2022). Contributions of sociodemographic changes to the increase in permanent childlessness in Brazil: A cohort decomposition analysis. Population Research and Policy Review, 41(5), 1951–1973. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-022-09725-3
[43] Hayford, S. R. (2013). Marriage (still) matters: The contribution of demographic change to trends in childlessness in the United States. Demography, 50(5), 1641–1661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-013-0215-3
[44] Ravanera, Z. R., & Beaujot, R. (2014). Childlessness of men in Canada: Result of a waiting game in a changing family context. Canadian Studies in Population, 41(1–2), 38–60. https://doi.org/10.25336/P6J02Q
[45] Whyman, T. (2024). Natalism, natality, and the climate crisis: An Arendtian argument against ‘green’ anti-natalism. The Journal of Value Inquiry. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10790-024-09994-5
[46] Szalma, I., & Szczuka, B. J. (2025). Reproductive choices and climate change in a pronatalist context. East European Politics and Societies, 39(2), 332–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/08883254241229728
[47] Gouni, O., Jarašiūnaitė-Fedosejeva, G., Kömürcü Akik, B., Holopainen, A., & Calleja-Agius, J. (2022). Childlessness: Concept analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3), Article 1464. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031464
[48] Neal, J. W., & Neal, Z. P. (2025). Tracking types of non-parents in the United States. Journal of Marriage and Family, 87(4), 1747–1762. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.13097
[49] Graham, M., Hill, E., Shelly, J., & Taket, A. (2013). Why are childless women childless? Findings from an exploratory study in Victoria, Australia. Journal of Social Inclusion, 4(1), 70–89. https://doi.org/10.36251/josi63